12 JUNE 2021 / BY RAVIK BONNEFOUS
NEW INSIGHTS that have stunned even the most pessimistic of futurists, regarding "the fact that the system of control of EVERY POSSIBLE ASPECT of human life and subsequent repression of the same" is not just a possibility in some far-off future but rather OUR PRESENT-DAY REALITY !? Is this that 'MONSTER' that will far surpass any pandemic that the world has ever seen !?
Do you remember that only a couple of months before the onset of COVID-19 PANDEMIC a meeting called "EVENT 201" was held in New York City ? Do you remember that the aim of this event was to simulate an outbreak and that such a simulation in this case accurately predicted almost everything that would happen in the upcoming period ?
Scenarios such as this have apparently been run on numerous occasions and it is "purely coincidental" that this one, based on THIS particular large family of viruses, "to some extent came true". It is also simply coincidental that this particular event was held precisely by those who have offered the world the only solutions to the problem in the form of VACCINES ! The question that now remains is: according to all statistical and/or social movement laws what is the PROBABILITY that something like that could all have been completely ACCIDENTAL !?
Are you aware of the fact that the famous French research scientist Luc Montagnier, who had received a Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine for his work in identifying HIV, is amongst the world renowned scientists who, independently of one another, detected partial similarities between HIV and COVID-19 genomes which, according to all the laws of medicine and biology, should not have appeared there naturally, but could have ARTIFICIALLY... Following this, another surprising fact lies in the fact that they were all subsequently labeled as "conspiracy theorists"... Why is it that they weren't extended the courtesy of, what has been considered as common practice in medicine for a very long time, partaking in any expert or public debates !?
Did you know that in the field of robotics there are various projects that are underway, one of which is development of DRONES of various sizes and flexibility, with a special emphasis being placed on ones that involve AI and facilitate autonomous functioning (unmanned drones). In view of this, some people think this form of ‘innovative technology’ is one of the most represented and sought out branches related to the field of "security technology" that has been developed in order for governments to gain control over 'ordinary people' all under the pretext of it being done in order to "prevent criminal offenses or other unimaginable events that present danger not only to our society but to the offenders themselves". In one of the largest and most powerful countries in the world they are being introduced into the police force whilst the project is not being scrutinized by other nations that are considered to be "the backbones of world democracy" and the reason for them not openly opposing such projects could possibly lie in the fact that they themselves plan on doing the SAME, something that can be ascertained not only through official documents but also through development projects that are underway and that are financed either directly by the state or through related private companies !!!
Completely irrelevant and devoid of our opinion of him and whether or not we see things in the same manner as he does BUT what do you think could happen to us, ‘ordinary people’, anywhere on earth if it was possible for the president of the most powerful country in the world and the "backbone of world democracy" to be CENSORED and then very openly and publicly BANNED from social networks simply for having opposed the mainstream media, and all without any counteraction from the state which is constitutionally supposed to protect every individuals "right to freedom of speech”!?
We have all seen that millions of people throughout the world can be placed under house arrest as "countless victims COULD suffer as a result of an invisible enemy..", and that although people lost their jobs, were traumatized, impaired and their quality of life forever changed... in the end, ‘when it counted’, majority of them had still QUIETLY ACCEPTED it and ‘moved on’ !?
What kind of message does something like this send to those who have or will have an idea of, and a plan for, the implementation of “SOCIAL CARDS” !?
What would happen if YOU accepted something such as this simply because you haven't thought about it long enough since just as you were reading this article you may have had the need to make an important life changing decision on "exactly where and when you were to meetup with a friend for that amazing drink that could not be postponed as you simply had to know precisely what.." !?
ELECTRONIC MONEY is the currency that is stored in banking computer systems that comes with increased flexibility and convenience for all involved. ELECTRONIC MONEY and VIRTUAL CURRENCY differ in that electronic money does not change the value of the fiat currency (national currency), while virtual currency is not equivalent to any fiat currency, so in saying that we can understand that all digital currency is electronic money, but inverse is not necessarily true. So now, what will happen when paper money is replaced by ELECTRONIC MONEY !?
All over the world preparations for this have been underway for a number of years and during the COVID-19 PANDEMIC those efforts have intensified and started to be implemented all under the notion that: it has been proven “that the virus can be transmitted through money” which at the same time does not “prevent or allow for social distancing to be upheld”, thus leaving room for the “official premiere” to soon take place at the same location where the “SOCIAL CARD system” began, and in doing so propagate the ‘vicious’ cycle !
Is it possible that the instant that the electronic money completely displaces paper money - which is considered as something INEVITABLE ‘within the framework of global progress’- absolutely every move a person makes will be monitored and statistically analyzed, from buying a newspaper from the street vendor (when, for example, it will be known exactly what someone is looking for and thus where their interests lie and let's say how often and just how dedicated they are to something simply based on the budget that they allocated for it) to what they eat.. where, when, and with whom they spend their time.. and what their overall habits are to name but a few !? Is it possible that at that moment a person whose "SOCIAL RATING" fell to a certain level.. could, with just one push of a button, lose their entire savings and even ‘become homeless’, or lose the means crucial for covering the legal costs involved in the process that they would have to undertake in order to protect their then-threatened rights !?
Ideally, in practice, “SOCIAL CARD system” could be something that could significantly improve people's quality of life but ! ..the main concern is: “WHO is to decide on the criteria for scoring and sanctioning, and WHAT gives them the right to encroach on MY PRIVACY.. because I, as a FREE person, have the right to freedom of thought...” !
Is it possible that at some stage a new "invisible enemy" will appear which will be ‘extremely unpredictable and detectable only by way of an elevated body temperature’, so that measuring our body temperature becomes a new NORM and a PRECONDITION for accessing any public space and public place such as: transportation facilities, shops, schools, parks, etc. UNLESS one has gotten vaccinated with a ‘specially formulated VACCINE’ (or maybe a drug that won't be as invasive and controversial as a vaccine), that we might even be required to get at precisely defined time intervals "given that it will be impossible to eradicate that infectious agent in its entirety" !?
I sincerely hope that my previous statement is purely a fictional one, that will serve only as a warning.. but you yourself consider whether it MAKES SENSE for the described to happen after all, if in just the past year and a bit everything that we could never have predicted, even in our worst nightmares, has already come true.
In 2005, George Orwell’s novel "1984" reached Time Magazine's "100 best English-language novels published since 1923" together with his other well-known work with similar content called the "Animal Farm", and with the advent of the COVID-19 PANDEMIC has became one of the most coveted titles in bookstores worldwide, while at the same time its movie ratings and/ viewing time jumped sharply.. with a tendency of further accelerated growth !!!
It is one of the top literary works that has been translated into multiple foreign languages. On the other hand, distribution of the novel and/ the movie has been banned or sanctioned in various ways in many countries including those that are considered to be "bastions of democracy” and which we will not discuss further on this occasion as it could be misunderstood and seen as our interfering in politics !?
(NOTE: pictorial representation of a scene from “Nineteen Eighty-Four”, a British film written and directed by Michael Radford in 1984, based upon George Orwell's 1949 novel by the same name, produced by: Virgin Films, Umbrella-Rosenblum Films, Atlantic Entertainment Group and distributed by 20th Century Fox, is cited here solely as a recommendation !)
George Orwell wrote the novel towards the end of his life, with great effort and sacrifice since he was already seriously ill at the time.MESSAGE FOR THE END
According to an opinion of a large number of prominent individuals, the greatest achievement of the twentieth century is not considered to be the emergence of great innovations and innovative technologies which have reshaped the world such as: artificial intelligence, nuclear energy, technology development regarding space travel, and so on.. but rather something entirely different: COMPROMISE ! ..because people were, for the first time since the beginning of history, able to come to an agreement on some key issues in society that suited all parties involved.. and did so mostly by avoiding conflict in most problematic of situations !
The author of this article completely agrees with that, but feels that one very important fact must be mentioned as well and that is that "we must absolutely never compromise when it comes to the TRUTH" ! Some well-meaning individuals would add the word MORAL to this ‘mix’, which sounds quite right, however.. “moral” is still something that depends on one’s own perception of the world and as such is a rather ‘relative notion’.
PURCHASE AND SUPPORT
1 of our messages 'out there' might mean 100 new like-minded people in just 1 day !
Finally, consider whether it is possible to CHANGE something after all ! Some people seem to think so and have already achieved great RESULTS !
I have already recommended the here mentioned video in my first article, but due to the rarely positive reviews that it has received I thought it useful to mention on this occasion as well.
After having written my article and just before it came out on the blog, I sent a raw copy of it to a friend of mine so as to hear his thoughts on the matter and get his honest criticism of it. I thought I had done a good and useful job in terms of writing on something "that a few people seem to remember" but then I got his reply. The feedback that I received contained a valuable internet address that sent me to a video which deals with similar subject matter, and although it has an obvious futuristic dimension to it and the element of "artistically encouraged unreality" its quality of work in terms of warning messages seemed more effective and easier to understand than mine ! In light of this, I would like to take this opportunity mad share this link with you:
Thank you for taking the time to read this article and consider what I have had to say !
About The AuthorRAVIK BONNEFOUS
In the words of my associate: “Writer of the article holds a degree in economics but is to be considered a true scholar of the world. He spent his formative years in both urban and rural areas and upon completing his degree has worked and lived both at home and abroad. Knowledgeable, well read, broadminded, logical, idealistic, and at the same time, realistic, he is involved in broad spectrum of projects and subjects ranging from sociology, history, art, to modern technology. A highly versatile individual who is self-confident and yet willing to listen to, and consider, other people's opinions, a quality which is in today's society deemed to be quite a rare one. Psychology is one of his passions in life and provides him with a unique understanding of the human condition and the world that we live in”.